Chelsea Make A Move For Jack Butland
We’ve been linked to Jack Butland for a little while now, but I always hesitated when it came to writing about it because there never se...
https://www.chelseadaft.org/2013/01/chelsea-make-move-for-jack-butland.html
We’ve been linked to Jack Butland for a little while now,
but I always hesitated when it came to writing about it because there never
seemed anything concrete enough to base the links on. Now that Sky Sports are
reporting that we have made a bid however, I feel there is enough reason to
look at the potential this signing could have.
Let’s talk about Butland first of all. He’s relatively new
on the scene, and was originally scouted by bigger clubs while on loan at Cheltenham Town
from Birmingham
during last season.
I happen to be in quite a good position to talk about him
because my best mate lives and dies for Birmingham City
and has kept me informed on him for over a year. He spent the whole of last
season telling me about this young goalkeeper that was out on loan who would
become the next big thing. It was him that made me aware of Butland before he
ever got his call up to the Olympic GB team.
He left Cheltenham Town after his final game to a standing
ovation from the crowd, and his exploits while on loan were what earned him a
starting place in the Olympic GB squad, his place in the Euros squad (after
Ruddy withdrew through injury) and his first England appearance in a friendly
against Italy. In fact he is the youngest goalkeeper to ever earn a cap for England .
So Butland looked like he might just be the next big thing
as my mate was claiming. If we had tried to sign him back then, I would have
been very excited. However, since then, his form has dipped a bit while playing
for Birmingham.
I’ve watched a couple Birmingham
games this season and on both occasion he looked a little dodgy, especially
when coming out to claim or punch the ball from a cross. It seems that he has been
struggling for consistency, making a lot of mistakes and my mate even told me
this morning (and I quote): “If you signed him for £1m he would be a bigger
waste of money than the deal for Torres.”
Well, he’s obviously exaggerating, but you get his point. He
doesn’t really rate him anymore and is hugely frustrated with how he seems to
have gone backwards this season. I trust his assessments because he really is
an expert on his club. I might add that while he was impressive through the
Olympics, he looked a little calamitous during the 45 minutes that he was
playing for England .
That said, the lad is only 19. You might even say that you
would expect these kind of mistakes from him, especially when the weight of
expectation on him has been so huge. Even though he hasn't stood out in the
Championship so far, the most important thing that makes this deal potentially
beneficial for us, were it to go through, is that is reputation remains intact. A
good four or five EPL clubs have also been linked with him, and a year like the
one he had last season is not forgotten in a few months, nor does talent like
that disappear over night.
I say that it’s important that he hasn’t lost that reputation
because were we to sign him, it would be for a different purpose than our other
keepers serve. We already have two world class keepers in Cech and Courtois.
The latter is likely to go on loan in the EPL next season, but in the immediate
seasons after, were we to keep both of them at first, Butland wouldn’t really
get a look in.
It looks like Turnbull and Hilario’s contracts will be up in
the summer, so our position next season would likely see us with Cech, Butland
and Blackman as our first squad keepers as things stand (as I doubt Courtois
will be coming into the squad).
I also don’t think the potential signing of Butland would
affect Courtois’ potential at Chelsea ,
or the likelihood of him being sold. For the moment, I would suspect that they
are wanted at Chelsea
for different reasons. Courtois is seen as the future and Butland perhaps more
as a back up with plenty of talent and with a potential for high sell-on value.
He would also count towards our home grown contingent.
Putting aside what my mate said about his value earlier in
the article, £3 million (which is what the bid is rumoured to approximately be)
is not a bad amount of money for a player who is to serve this purpose. He will
be capable of standing in when needed and can be developed into a source of
profit at worst. I don’t think it would have a huge affect on the progress of
Blackman either, as keepers often take a little longer to develop, and I
wouldn’t be surprised if one of them was loaned out anyway.
Butland is not in the same league as Courtois or Cech, two
exceptional goalkeepers, nor do I personally believe he ever will be. That’s my
opinion but then again it is early to be making that claim and I still believe
that this signing would benefit the club.
Benitez has said that we won’t be bringing in anymore
players, but on the other hand he has also said that it isn’t his job, so who
knows really. Besides, even if we didn’t bring Butland in now, there would still be
a good chance of us brining him in during the summer. Our interest is certainly
there. I may have questioned his form this season, but he has certainly proven
before now that he has the talent and attitude we’re looking for, and even if
he didn’t play a great deal, he would still serve a purpose at Chelsea .
Follow on twitter: @cody_bound
Follow on twitter: @cody_bound
Find your Chelsea tickets at Viagogo!
Carefree & KTBFFH!